Disclaimer: These are my thoughts and opinions with my current level of knowledge and understanding, which I'm the first to admit is not great. I'm certain as I learn more I will weaken or strengthen, toss out, or completely change my views. Please comment with your views, but please keep in mind my admitted ignorance and keep your words kind. :)
Is it just me, or do some evolutionists (and atheists, for that matter), seem to just be another group of religious fanatics trying to convert you to their beliefs? It seems like anyone who dares question any of Darwin's theories as scientists currently understand them is ridiculed as a heretic.
In Physics last summer, my teacher introduced science as something where you do not accept ANYTHING based on someone's say so. It all has to be evidence based from your own experience. He also said that scientists are a funny bunch. When a colleague creates something (a new theory), the acceptable way to respond is to attempt to destroy their creation. If it withstands the skepticism and repeated testing and experimenting, then it is deemed of value.
I agree with this whole-heartedly. I am very skeptical. I want to learn everything for myself and figure things out until they click in my head and make sense to my being (aka spirit).
However, I feel like many scientists don't actually agree with this skepticism. If anyone expresses skepticism about evolution in particular, they are not praised as a true scientist, but they seem to be ridiculed. I read a quote from some guy a few months ago (forgive me, I only remember the jist of it), saying that science cannot exist with God. He had some pretty strong words about the fools who believe in God and said that science very effectively disproves the existence of such a being. I found myself wondering if this is the common view of the entire scientific community or if this guy was just a bit over-the-top.
I myself believe in Natural Selection, it's pretty dang obvious. But I don't necessarily believe it was the sole mechanism for creating the current diversity of life we enjoy on the earth. So far I don't know enough, but I suspect that evolution CAN happen in individuals, not just populations, and be passed on to their posterity. That may sound preposterous to most people, and maybe after further study I'll find that it is. But isn't that what science is about? Inferring truth and meaning based on what you currently know.
Geology is based heavily on uniformitarianism (spell checker doesn't like that word, but I think I spelled it correctly haha). I think that Geologists are incredible scientists who are really rather like detectives. It's super fun to try to figure out what happened to get a given land form to where it is today. However I think that uniformitarianism is a bit too simple. I think it could be foolish to take this tiny amount of data we have from recorded history, and apply it to billions of years. The only constant is change. I think Geology is great for figuring out how things happened but I don't necessarily believe that they took the amount of time they suppose. I do think that geologic processes could have happened at different speeds during different times of earth history. There are too many factors to assume things were always as they are now.
I think that Darwin effectively disproved the idea of the earth being only a few thousand years old. But I think him jumping to the conclusion that this meant there was no God at all may have been a bit hasty.
My Microbiology teacher always called DNA the "Spirit molecule". I could never tell if he was making fun of religious people or if he believes in something like that. I think "spirit" is much smaller than DNA though. Perhaps quantum physics is scratching the surface of something. I think there are so many things at play on the sub-atomic level that we may never understand. And call me crazy if you want, but I think spirit (and indeed, God) is in there- somewhere.
Thanks for reading. Please comment. :) And have a nice day.